What Can Men Do?

DB from Live. Laugh. Love. stumbled across a thread at a… shall we say “notorious radical feminist’s” blog.  I’m loathe to link to her or even mention her name for fear of incurring her wrath.  I hope y’all won’t see this as cowardly, but merely as prudent.

Anyway, this feminist is having a shitty day.  Some troll offered to poke some holes in her and rape her in them.  A guy showed up to offer his support of her, and, as you might imagine, it turned into something out of Bassarids, what with how the women in the comments turned on him.

DB was watching all this from the sidelines and emailed me the following questions:

In conversations we have had and in some posts on your blog, you have stated that “nice guys” need to not take it anymore by speaking out when it comes to the image of men being shaped by rapists, abusers, and all-around jerks.  My concerns when it comes to this are manifold.  For example:

1. How does a man show support for women without appearing to be seen as “the protector of women who can’t protect themselves”?

2. How to properly show anger at those jerks without appearing to be more concerned with the image of men rather than actually having concern for women?

3. Being labeled a “man terrorist” for not doing enough of the “right” thing.

4. Is this just all hopeless because men are pigs and will always be pigs in the eyes of feminists? 

I think these are great questions and I’m going to offer my thoughts and then throw it open to all y’all, as I’m sure there will be a lack of consensus.

I just want to be clear where I’m starting from, too, as I think it’s important to realize that feminism is a broad umbrella term that mean something slightly different to everyone.  I believe we live in an extremely fucked up hierarchy that encourages the strong to prey on the weak and pretty much everyone is jockeying for position within that hierarchy to have it as good as he or she can. 

Because of how it works, I believe, right now, women in general, have it worse than men, black people have it worse than white people, rich people have it better than poor people, etc., though there are always exceptions.  I believe that women are fucked up in ways that make it very hard for us to trust other women and to work together with them for all our benefits.  We tend to believe that our worth is based on our ability to hook a man with high status.

As my friend Mack once said, women spend a lot of time doing a lot of PR work for the men they’ve fucked.  Well, yeah, because we want to show that we’ve snagged ourselves someone of status worthy of us.

I believe, too, that men are fucked up by this system, this way of relating to each other.  I think that there’s a strain of masculinity, of men who loathe themselves and who figure that anyone who loves them must be an even worse fucked up piece of shit than they are and so those people deserve whatever evil crap they want to dole out to them.  These same men, this same kind of masculinity, tends to view women as an accutrement that proves their status.

I think this kind of masculinity is a subset, a dangerous subset, of the masculinity that equates physical strength and the ability to do harm to others with being powerful.

I, as a feminist, want women to stop being so fucked up towards themselves–I want us to realize that we have inherent value and inherent power and inherent worth and that there’s nothing worthwhile gained from running around treating each other like shit.

But I also want men to stop being so fucked up towards themselves–I’d like to advocate for a type of masculinity that equates power with the ability to make others feel safe and powerful themselves.

Okay, then, whoo.  That was a hell of a disclaimer.  Let’s answer us some questions.  In reverse, because I’m cool like that.

4.  Is this just all hopeless because men are pigs and will always be pigs in the eyes of feminists?

Nope.  I think there’s plenty of reason to hope.  For one, things are decidedly better now than they were in the past (see the decline in rapes for proof of that).  And for another, as long as we keep putting grown men in our vaginas, we’re going to keep on pulling baby men out of them.  It’s one thing to be convinced that all grown-ass men are pigs.  It’s quite another to think of your four year old son that way.

3.  Being labeled a “man terrorist” for not doing enough of the “right” thing.

If you ask any police officer, he or she will tell you that answering domestic dispute calls sucks ass because often the woman will decide to physically defend the man who was beating the crap out of her.  Or ask Exador how some girls will try to encourage you to fight their men for whatever reason (or shoot, doesn’t Bobby Bare Jr. have a song about that?).  My point is that the right thing to do isn’t always clear and asking men to just be able to discern when they should step in and when they shouldn’t is, I think, still encouraging this idea that men should be better than women, or at least have superhuman skills.

Here’s the thing, and maybe I’ll take some slack for saying this, but I still think I’m right.  If we conceed that everyone is fucked up, then I think we can say that a person has a right to ask another person to stop doing something–to stop their racist, sexist, whateverist behavior–and that we, as civilized people ought to do whatever we can to stop doing that, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT fucked up people will sometimes ask for fucked up things and we have the right to refuse to do fucked up things.  Does that make sense?  I hope so.  To put it more clearly, just because someone has been a victim doesn’t insure that their ideas about what would set things right are always reasonable.

This seems to me to be a clear instance of that–women who have actually been very hurt by men wanting something unreasonable.  Men can’t automatically know what they must do in order to be not lumped in with the “man terrorists” (and, in fact, I suspect there’s nothing they can do that would exclude them from that term).

I think it’s awesome that DB, for instance, wants to know what to do, but I don’t think there’s any reasonable thing he could do.  As Maya Angelou says, most people don’t want change; they want exchange.  I’m not convinced that folks who run off well-meant offers of help really want change at the moment; they just want to feel powerful in circumstances that have made them feel powerless.

2.  How to properly show anger at those jerks without appearing to be more concerned with the image of men rather than actually having concern for women?

I’ll be interested in hearing what other folks think about this, but I think I’m of the opinion that it doesn’t matter.  Men who treat women like shit don’t think very highly of women.  It’s imperative that those men stop treating women like shit.  If a man is doing something shitty to a woman, I think the first thing is to get it to stop.  If you have to appeal to how he’s making all men look bad, well, make him understand that he’s making all men look bad and you’re not going to stand for it.

1.  How does a man show support for women without appearing to be seen as “the protector of women who can’t protect themselves”?

The first thing that came to my mind when I read this kind of caught me by surprise, so I don’t know if it’s really the main thing men can do to show support for women, but I’m going to throw it out there anyway.

Don’t make your daughters hug or kiss people they don’t want to hug or kiss.

A thing we women tend to do, and I saw it today as I was coming out of Walgreens, is put our feelings of discomfort aside in order to appease men.  Like today, I’m walking out of Walgreen’s and there’s some guy I don’t know looking and sketchy and such and he comes up to me and starts in with, “Hey, pretty lady, can I talk to you?”

I didn’t make eye contact, but I did say, “No.”

Dude was so startled that he hung in midstep for a good second.  Not “sorry, no,” or some other thing that said “I don’t want to make you uncomfortable, but I must be going.”  Just “no.”

But the woman right after me, Dumbass, goes right up to him when he asks to talk to her and starts digging around in her purse looking for change to give him and takes her eyes off him and acts as if what she’s up to is just how things should go, that a yucky dude wants her attention and it’s her place to give it and her money to him.

How do I know all that?  Because I sat in my car watching the whole thing with my cell phone out where he could see it, in case he tried anything.  He seemed displeased by that.  She seemed oblivious.

So, my first bit of advise to you is to teach your daughters to be street smart, to feel that their bodies are theirs and that they decide who has access to them and who doesn’t, and teach your daughters to feel powerful themselves.

Hell, that’s probably good advise for your boys, too.  Start young teaching them that their bodies are their own and that power is about helping everyone feel strong and powerful and safe.

Second, no matter how shitty your ex-wife is, pay your child support and don’t skip out on your kids.  It’s hard, but the better a person you are in adversity models for your sons how they should be (“even when things are unfair, we real men make the best of it and do the right thing, even when we’d rather not”) and it sets a standard for how your daughters think they can be expected to be treated.

Third, embrace the idea of enthusiastic consent.  Of course “no” means “no.”  But folks should be having sex with people who have given a definative and delighted “yes.”

When you hear other men joking about having to cajole a girl into having sex with them, make it clear that you’re laughing at them, not with them.

The important thing, I think, is that men have to talk to each other about this stuff.  But I think that, in order to do that, you have to look at the shit you’re being fed about yourselves–about how you’re monsters who just cannot help but hurt women, for instance–and speak out about that stuff, too.  You don’t have to be strident about it.  But you can say things like “Hey, speak for yourself.  Maybe you can’t [whatever] but I can.”  Or “Oh, yeah, like I’m going to believe that getting a girl so drunk she can’t say no is a reasonable substitute for the woman I love being all ‘hell yes!’”

You see what I’m saying?  I don’t think you can reasonably insert yourself right at the worst moments and expect to do much good.  Real good is done by changing how we think about things in general.

And, again, I don’t think we can use those who clearly just want exchange as a proper guide for what we should be doing.

Oh, hell, yes!  Men, y’all also need ethical pleasure.

What will change, real change, look like?

I don’t know. 

But let’s do what delights us and doesn’t hurt anyone and see where that takes us.

Might be interesting.

19 Responses

  1. Speaking of the “men as monsters” trope. I think that’s one of the reasons it’s hard for me to find common ground with particular feminists. Men aren’t monsters and they can help but treat women like shit. Why would we say otherwise? Why would we use the dominant narrative about men, one we know is untrue, against them? How is that not about exchange instead of change?

  2. Thanks Aunt B for answering those questions. I always appreciate your perspective.

    One of the things that struck me most alarmingly at that-blog-we-don’t-speak-of was the trap set for men. There was a call for men to act to speak out against rapists and abusers or be labeled a “man terrorist” for inaction but then once a man did so, he was labeled as being concerned only with the image of men and not truly concerned about women. I understand what you said about exchange rather than change. I realize this is a small sect of feminists, but it is also quite a vocal one. I must say it is the one segment of feminism most convenient for media and “political commentors” to latch onto as the “spokespersons” for the feminist movement. It made me sad to think that the voices of reasonable feminists (and I quickly thought of you, hence my email) were squelched by the strident agenda of extremism. I really shouldn’t be surprised, it happens everywhere.

    “Don’t make your daughters hug or kiss people they don’t want to hug or kiss.” — That goes for immediate family members too.

    “But let’s do what delights us and doesn’t hurt anyone and see where that takes us.” — Strangely enough, this is a libertarian ideal. Maybe there is hope for you yet.

  3. “Don’t make your daughters hug or kiss people they don’t want to hug or kiss.” – Amen to the immediate family members bit. My parents have always made me go around and hug every single person before leaving big family gatherings, from childhood until now. Well, when you have to go around hugging everyone and telling them bye, it’s damn hard to avoid hugging your creepy uncle (by marriage), because that’s not “polite,” and it’s obvious. I never liked being forced to hug people, and I certainly never liked having to treat people (family or not) who gave me the run away willies like they’re perfectly acceptable regular folk. Ugh.

  4. Some folks are just nuts.

  5. Also, people you hesitate to link to or name for fear of incurring their wrath? Not worth your time.

  6. “Don’t make your daughters hug or kiss people they don’t want to hug or kiss.” – Amen to the immediate family members bit.

    This was something we always did.

    Until my cousin got busted for molesting a bunch of little boys. Funny how the “hug everyone” thing stopped right away after that.

  7. I should point out that I’m not afraid of her in the “oh, she’s so powerful, I’m so weak” way. I have just seen how she and her fans take after people they don’t like, getting on these crusades to practically drum them out of the blogosphere. And I think they fight dirty. They could come over here, read this, decide I’m too much trouble to take on, but, oh boy would it be fun to just make, say, Malia’s internet life unbearable, just because they followed DB’s link back and figured out that he had a wife. That’s why I don’t particularly want to do anything that would bring them around.

    Also, though, I think that proves a point I’ve made in the past, and one we’d do well to remember. Feminism is not a moral position. Advocating that women are better than men (which this group of feminists does, I believe) is not very different from that whole Angel of the House nonsense in which middle class white women were presumed to be so much better than men that they had to be kept home and sheltered from the evil world.

  8. B, I know, but I’m glad you clarified. I’ve made a rule for myself that I don’t go places where the fans are so hostile. I don’t think you can really have a discussion under those conditions.
    Kat, that’ll do it. I think it’s just creepy and wrong to force children to ignore their instincts about a person. These days I hear, “Yes, you never liked him, did you?” Uh, no. Dude hid my shoes in the microwave.

  9. Also, don’t think I didn’t notice the “Libertarian” word being thrown around already in this conversation. No, no, no. You’ll never catch me!

    Ha, yes, I am the Gingerbread B. in the Libertarian Book of Fairy Tales.

  10. Yeah, I don’t regularly read her. I know who she is and how she does because I have seen enough fall-out when she and her folks have decided to take after people I do read. And when DB sent me the link to the discussion I was just like, damn it. Because you know, I try to ignore her. I think it’s obvious to most feminists that there are folks who need and benefit from her style and folks who really, really don’t and never the twain shall meet.

    But, clearly, that’s not obvious to outsiders and when something horrific happens to her–like the comment she got about someone wanting to cut her and rape the holes–most people who just stumble across that want to express anger and concern. They have no idea that such expression is not going to be met well and I think they get angry and confused when it’s not.

    I really don’t know what can be done about that, if anything.

  11. I agree with your exegesis, B, but I also think that anyone who has been threatened with “pok[ing] some holes in her and raping] her in them” gets at least half a week to be completely irrational about men. And her support group gets 24 hours.

  12. I agree.

    Here’s my problem, though. No man should make a comment like that. Ever. And, considering that it sounds like a pretty specific death threat, the person should be hunted down and charge as such.

    But the thing is, though sexism and misogyny is at the core of that threat, it’s not representative of how all men secretly feel about all women. This is not a man threatening a woman who happens to be this specific woman. This is a man threatening this specific woman in ways that are vile and misogynist because he has read enough of her to know that that’s what will have the greatest effect on her.

    I’m not trying to dictate how people should react to death threats. But it strikes me as weird that they have turned this into a referendum on how men treat women, with very little talk about what she can do to track this guy down and protect herself from him.

    I find that weird and I don’t understand it and it concerns me.

    But, like I said, I don’t read her regularly. Maybe in context, it makes sense. Maybe everyone already knows that, of course, she’s taking steps to handle this and so it makes sense to move onto the stage of venting and being pissed.

  13. One of the things I love the most about the female of our species is her ability AND willingness to express herself; I wish my sex was generally as blessed. I see DB’s questions about how we are “supposed” to speak out belying a fear I think we guys have about such expression. We are more worried about being “right” or not opening ourselves to criticism, (well, some of us are; the others are the jerks we’re talking about) so we end up keeping quiet or worse, trying to lie/bluff/bullshit. Hell, I’m may be doing it right now! So I’ll get to my point: This post-I loved it, because it gets me thinking, pondering, about “us,” but in particular about the dynamic of male-female (hetersexually speaking anyway) relationships. I’ve got my own answers to DB’s questions, but I’ll keep them to myself. It’s the questions that matter.

  14. Not to necessarily defend the commenters but part of the equation I think is knowing the rules of one’s location. How a man should behave in the comments on a radical feminist blog is not necessarily the same way he should behave everywhere else.

  15. I just wanted to point out that Radfems do not believe women are better than men. this is a completely false interpretation of radical feminism. Radfems support cultural changes through undermining the patriarchy and hierarchal structure that oppresses women while giving privilege to men.

    As one radfem I’ve linked to wrote: “to equate radical feminism to man-hating is to assume the patriarchy and men are inseparable”

    Aunt B, would you mind telling me (even if it’s in email) exactly which radfem this about, as the one I’m thinking about currently under attack consists of alot more than a few threatening emails.

  16. I’ve read some things by self-proclaimed radical feminists that did, indeed, assume that patriarchy and men were inseperable. Granted, they were held to not be intrinsically inseperable … but there is a definite (if teensy) strain that holds that gendered power dynamics are so fucked right now that having anything to do with men (sleeping with them, counting them as friends, letting them call themselves feminists, etc.) is, well, traitorous. They are the people that call for gender-wide ‘political lesbian’ separatism, and the ones likeliest to fit the man-hating stereotype in my book.

    That said, I’m well aware that they aren’t a majority and that they don’t speak for everyone who shares their chosen ideological identification. I get that, and I accept it… I just find it bothersome that thus far every single conversation I’ve been in or read about radfems has had people pop up saying “but we never said that!” Which again, while generally true of the person making the statement, also makes me think of the oft repeated rejoinder to offended men – if you’re not doing this, it’s not about you.

  17. Archcrone, we may indeed be speaking of the same person, if this person has also had her boards shut down by these evil idiots. If that doesn’t clear it up, just drop me an email.

    Also, that’s what I said to DB in my email to him, that before I got familiar with this part of the internet landscape, I would have laughed at the notion that radical feminists thought they were better than men. As I said to him, most of them aren’t talking about or to men, that’s not where their interests lie.

    Mag, like I said, I don’t really know what to do about it. Not like there’s anything to be done about it, but again, it’s like I want two words. Radical Feminists for those folks who are what I understand radical feminists to be and [something] for those women who identify as radical feminists, but don’t actually seem to share some important commonalities.

    But, you know, maybe that’s not for me to do. It’s probably not.

  18. Aunt B, if this is the same person, and I’m not wuite sure based on DB’s first comment above (I’m thinking he may have stumbled onto a blog of the original attackee’s supporter), but if it’s who I’m thinking, I’ve known this woman’s writing (via the internet) for the better part of the last decade. We’re not best friends, but she is someone that I have a tremendous amount of respect for.

    I’ve read this woman’s life as she poured it out in posts and on her own forum. She has walked a very long and arduous life, fighting off batterers, rapists and the religious right, all successfully, and she continues to do so by helping those women that need help. She walks the walk she talks. If I ever found my self in the position of needing help, she would be one of the first people I’d turn to, for her wisdom and her knowledge and mostly, because I know I could trust her implicitly.

    Her forum (not her blog) has been a haven for many, many women, including myself, and this attack has hurt them all. And by the way, the terrorists that launched this DOS attack on her forum, have also posted a very public web page attacking her, and her children, as well as several of her supporters and their children.

    Whether or not you agree with her politics, or her view points, this attack on her effects us all. If this group can launch an attack on her, they can launch an attack on anyone, for whatever reason they wish. To stand up to these terrorists requires putting aside politics and ideology and showing solidarity. You know, not falling into the whole “First they came for _____, and I did nothing,” ideal.

    To close, when one has been under a constant attack, as she has been, it is completely natural to be wary and distrustful of the “I come in peace” poster. think of that poster as the stranger you don’t want your daughter to hug.

  19. I’m responding to DB’s questions without having seen the original thread, and giving what I would answer to those questions being asked in about any scenario.

    First, I’d point out that there’s a problem with the questions themselves: They ask how a person, in this case a man, can be seen and responded to in a certain way. There are two problems with this:

    1. I can’t answer that and neither can anyone else. Everyone’s perceptions and responses will differ, so no one can tell you how to avoid being called a bad guy by someone or other. This holds true for feminists as for everyone else — there is no single decision-making entity for all feminism that makes these calls.

    2. The focus of the questions is on getting the treatment the person wants — being treated as one of the good guys or at least not one of the bad guys — as opposed to focusing on building a more decent world. Posting questions framed that way is naturally going make people think you might “be more concerned with the image of men rather than actually having concern for women”.

    Better question: “Ok, so in your opinion I failed in XYZ instance. What do you think I could/should do that would be better?”

    As for what I personally think you can and should do, I can come up with a few:

    1. Pay attention to your wording in matters like I just described, because it makes a difference. Don’t get all huffy when people respond to what you said instead of what you meant.

    2. As suggested, speak up when you witness other men saying/doing misogynist things. Your silence is taken as tacit support by the jerks who do this things, and you wind up feeding the problem.

    3. Learn to put yourself in the position of others before just assuming they should assume you mean well. For example, victims of extreme violence, such as sexual assault, often really don’t need your expressed anger to support them. They may experience that anger as just another burden — great, now ANOTHER angry man who is walking around, like there aren’t enough already.

    They need your expressed anger like a hole in the head if it includes things like, “guys like that should be in jail!!!!” — Think about that one for a bit. It may sound supportive, but only if you’re not paying attention. If you’ve read up on the subject even a little, you know that choosing what action to take against the perpetrator is an agonizing one fraught with risk to the victim’s life, and they certainly don’t need any statements from you that even hint at what they “should” do in such a situation. Since victims of such crimes have had their right to choice removed in the most horrible possible way, what they need most is to be surrounded by people who respect their rights to choose, whether for good or for ill.

    I hope this is helpful.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 172 other followers