A Little Pitbull Advocacy
It seems like every time the pitbull controversy comes up, those of us who love a “pit bull” type dog end up making the same points over and over. I thought I’d use ths page to bring together in one spot all my points.
Here we go.
The term ‘pit bull’ is so generic that it has almost no meaning other than “a vicious dog that scares me.”
Without getting into too much history, there are a lot of dog breeds that trace their origins back to the fighting pits, from the Boston Terrier, through the various bull dog breeds and the boxer, into the mastiffs. But not all of these dogs have bad reputations and not all of these breeds are still fought (I hope).
Much of the confusion about what is a pitbull and what isn’t comes down to this: the word “pitbull” is used to describe a specific breed of dog, a type of dog, and a dog that has a certain, inhumane, job.
The specific breed of dog is the American Pit Bull Terrier, which is not recognized by the AKC (though it was at one point), but is recognized by other kennel clubs. The American Pit Bull Terrier is very closely related to the American Staffordshire Terrier, but there are differences. I’m no expert, but to my eye, the American Pit Bull Terrier often has a lankier appearance and the look of the dog varies a lot more than the look of the AmStaff in terms of acceptable weights and sizes.
The type of dog is any bull dog that lacks the affable charm of the English Bulldog, including the ones recognized by the AKC–the AmStaff, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, the Bull Terrier, and sometimes the Bull Mastiff–and ones that aren’t, like the American Bulldog and the American Pit Bull Terrier. All of these dogs come under the umbrella term “pitbull,” though they vary greatly in size and appearance. That’s why both the dog in the Target commercials and the Our Gangshorts are called pitbulls, even though they don’t look a thing alike.
Then there’s the dog that has the terrible job.
[Let me just take a moment to say that, if you fight dogs, you suck. It doesn’t prove your worth as a man. Well, yes it does, just not in the way you intend. It proves that you are a monster and a coward and, if there is any justice, the dogs whose deaths you are responsible for will get some sort of revenge in the afterlife. Maybe they’ll stand around and watch you morons repeatedly fight each other to the death. Taking the best qualities of something–undying loyalty to you, tenaciousness, strength, and bravery–and perverting them so that it can kill and die for your amusement is unconscionable.]
I’ve seen a few of these dogs and, to me, they look very different than Mrs. Wigglebottom (though this site suggests I’m imagining the differences). In fact, I’ve had a number of people familiar with fighting dogs who insist that Mrs. Wigglebottom must be part boxer because she’s much too big to be a pitbull. In general, my experience is that fighting dogs are smaller than she is. Their faces more resemble the Staffordshire Terrier than her. They often don’t have ears at all. Also, if you look at them face on, their necks seem situated lower on their chests than Mrs. Wigglebottom, and their chests aren’t as deep. This gives them the appearance of having longer legs in proportion to their bodies.
But fighting dogs aren’t a breed of dog the way the AKC thinks of it. If someone wanted a fighting dog that was a little bigger, he’d find an AmStaff and breed it into his dogs for size. If he found a really vicious Lab (if there is such a dog), he’s use that as breeding stock. The dog fighter isn’t as interested in “breed standards” as he is in dogs that can win. This is one of the reasons we’ve come to think of any medium sized terrier mix as a “pit bull” and one of the reasons so many people have a “I know it when I see it” attitude towards pit bull recognition.
Yes, “pit bulls” do attack and kill more people a year than other breeds of dogs, but…
Again, as we talked about above, “pit bull” is not just a breed. You are, in effect, comparing apples to apple trees. When you take six to ten breeds, any dog that is a mix of those breeds, and dogs that you think might be those breeds and lump them all together as one group, it is going to skew the results.
Think of it this way. Say you were trying to determine how dangerous I was and the statistics were all “A.s kill 7 men a year.” “G.s kill 10 men a year.” “J.s kill 3 men a year.” But “Aunts kill 100 men a year.” It would seem as if Aunts are way more dangers than any other type of woman. But, if you were to discover that there are 25 different types of women who are considered aunts and we each only kill 4 men a year, you’d see that I was about as dangerous as J. and far less dangerous than G.
There are other, better predictors for whether a dog is dangerous than their breed.
Seriously, the next time you hear about a horrific dog attack, check the details against this list.
–Is the dog larger than 25 pounds? (Obviously, there are vicious small dogs, but unless a dachshund has all day, he’s probably not going to kill you.)
–Is it an unfixed male?
–Is it chained up outside alone for most of the day if not all the time?
–Is it running loose outside?
–Is anyone out there with it?
–Does it have adequate housing?
–Is the dog supervised?
–Do the dog’s owners–who probably insist that the dog is friendly and never given anyone trouble–seem to have gone to extraordinary lengths to make the dog seem scary otherwise (spiked collars, thick chains, encouraging aggressive behavior)?
The truth is that dog behavior is not some great mystery to human beings. We’ve lived with them now for 10,000 years and we know what makes them go wrong. It has little to do with the dog and a lot to do with how the dog has been raised.
People who own “pit bulls” tend to be assholes. Let’s be honest.
Let’s just put all the cards on the table. The problem is what it’s always been: some people regard dogs as pets and we coddle them and spoil them and take them to training from the time they’re old enough to be away from their moms and turn them into companion animals we ask nothing more of than to not snore so loud when they sleep on the couch.
And, for that purpose, the bully breeds make excellent dogs. They’re smart and funny and take training well and happily snore on the couch.
And some people have dogs because owning a bad dog makes them feel special and powerful. And so they take steps to ensure that their dogs are “bad” and powerful. They don’t neuter them. They don’t keep them leashed and supervised when outside. In fact, some folks actively train their dogs to be somewhat dangerous to others.
And bullies, because of their size and their power and their reputations, make good dogs for this too.
You could take two dogs from the same litter and have one be a wonderful pet and companion animal and the other ends up mauling some little kid to death, all depending on the kind of work each owner puts into it.
Yes, bullies have tendencies, but whether and how those tendencies express themselves comes down to what the people who own them bring them up to do.
We tend to assume that the problem is that good-hearted folks who just don’t know better have gotten in over their heads with fundamentally evil dogs and so, if we just remove the opportunity for them to have pitbulls from them, all will be right in the world.
Well, here’s the problem. Most people who own pitbulls are not good-hearted folks who just don’t know better. If my personal observations are true, most people who own pitbulls are jackasses who shouldn’t have any dogs, let alone a dog that needs constant supervision and training. Most pitbull owners I see here in Nashville don’t neuter their dogs. They don’t keep them in the house except for when they are out with the leashed dog. They don’t work to make sure that the dog isn’t aggressive. They seem to encourage displays of dominance and aggression and carry on like the dogs’ balls (both literally and metaphorically) say something about their balls.
And ridding the world of pitbulls isn’t going to magically fix what’s wrong with these people because they’re jackasses who should know better or take five seconds to read up on how to be a good owner to a terrier or take their dogs to training and to the vet regularly, but don’t, because they’re jackasses. At least when it comes to owning dogs.
If you prevent them from owning pitbulls, they will just move on to some other breed of dog. Or they’ll take up knife fighting or whatever is going to make them feel like big, powerful people. They will still be jackasses whose actions hurt others.



True that! It’s not the dog that’s bad, it’s the owner! That’s what I’ve always said, and it’s nice to see someone agree. Where I live, they made pitbull-type dogs (which could be a boxer, or even some mutt that looks like a pitbull) illegal. What a waste of taxpayers’ money! I say, they should ban irresponsible people from owning pets. It’s not the dog’s fault.
Again, I send you mega cyber-hugs for your pit bull advocacy. You and I (and many others) want to protect and do right by our wiggle-bottomed, snorfaling, snoring, pups.
We have a Jack Russel Terrier named Oliver. He’s the most perseverative creature I have ever encountered. And I’ve worked with some pretty severe “special needs” children in my years as a teacher aide. The terriers are intense, but smart, and therefore very trainable. Pit bulls are as prone to psychotic behavior as any other breed, but their intelligence makes them more vulnerable, IMHO. The bad rep is undeserved and reflects the owners more than anything, as Mitsu says.
I vote to euthanize the fighting dog owners & participants in the “sport,” rather than the dogs. I’d pay money to see that happen.
Let’s hear it again! I am the human mommie of a 10 yr old Staffie and he is my Pride and joy! There has never been a better breed in my opinion! He is the cutest, most adorable and sweet little baby dog! Yet so misunderstood. I could fill pages with the ridiculous questions and statements that some people make when we are out together in some public places. Most people actually cross the street to get away from him. As he heels securely at the short end of my 6ft double ended police dog leash.
I found your article to be very true and right on!! I NEVER refer to my dog as a “pitbull”! If people don’t know what a staffie or Staffordshire Terrier is I will sometimes say that they may know of the breed as a “pitbull” but he’s not. He has never, nor will he ever be in a pit against another dog!
I so agree w/ Alice, though I think they should be treated as they treat the dogs they pit. Euthanasia is far too humane for the inhumaness of dog fighting!
Thanks so much for this well-thought-out and well-written post. As a proud mommy of a pit baby (okay, he’s five, but he’s my baby), it definitely gets frustrating trying to explain to people that the dogs who make the news are the unfortunate, abused ones. The ones (like mine and yours and the other commenters’) raised in good homes, who are not beaten, not starved, not chained but are loved, well-fed, spoiled, and socialized are not the ones who make the news.
A poor young woman here in Knoxville was just killed by her roommate’s pits, and all people heard was the name of the breed. No one wanted to listen to how the owner was, in fact, hoping to make them into fighting dogs. He actually had meat hanging in a tree the day of the fatal attack. That young woman died because of someone else’s irresponsibility and lack of basic human kindness.
Sorry to have gotten on a soapbox there. :-) But, sincerely, thank you so much for eloquently expressing and explaining what, no doubt, ALL responsible owners feel.
three and a half cheers for common sense, as expressed in your post.. I was divoted in the leg several years (make that a coupla decades) ago by that exemplar of ferocious, irrational breeds…yes, I got chomped by a cocker spaniel.
But somehow, “pit cocker” just doesn’t sound as scary as “pit bull.”
Again, thanks for talking sense.
There is so much breed discrimination out there - not just pit bulls. We have a case here in Colorado involving a German Shepherd who is on death row for scaring a woman. Read more at http://www.rollo.com
I own a 75 lb female German Shepherd and people will cross the street to avoid walking near her! I know this current case isn’t helping my breed’s reputation at all.
We need more common sense and personal responsibilty in this society.
We are responsible for dogs - we are the one’s who domesticated them. People should be held accountable for their dogs and the rest of the dog-haters or breed discriminators out there should use common sense.
Nice blog.
http://www.hmks.wordpress.com
Oops, the Rolo dog website is http://www.rolodog.com.
Thanks.
i have a cross pit at home with 3 other dogs a jack russel yorkshire terrier and a chwawa they get on perfectly and to be honest the smallest is the worst tempered. i think bulls are very loyal and make gud pets. the only time a dog hurts a human is when they have been trained to do so. the only people that kill people are PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Excellent post. I owned a Staffordshire Bull Terrier and a Bull Terrier - the best of personalities!
It’s the wackos who fight them for “sport” that should be put down - not the poor dogs forced to fight.
My two darlings, Herschal and Ottis, look like gargoils. They have huge mouths and muscles. The reason that they have never done any damage is uncertain. It could be that I am a resposible Pitbul owner who never leaves them out, has a ten foot fenced yard, and supervises them at all times. When I take them out walking and people ask if they bite I always say that I dont know and ask them not to chance it.
It also could be that they are just gentle and sweet animals who have been raised on laps, being kissed and loved every day. I dont know.
Both of the possibilities are important to keep in mind. We are resposible owners/caretakers of a being that is physically capable of killing and maiming. We like these particular breed of dog because we are needy owners and these guys are the only breed I have found that are more than willing to lay there and take all the affection and baby talk that we are willing to spill out on them. my boys are nutered and LIKE to wear sweaters and hoody jackets that I find for them at the goodwill. They are both over one hundred pounds and were both confiscated as puppies from breeders who were fighting thier dogs.
I admire your entry here, you gave me information that I haddnt had before, and make a great case for a great breed. I have another, more historical and detailed piece on my blog ( http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=99920419&blogID=311983251 ) but not nearly as well written and with the ideas and statistical findings you have here.
Great post. I have an American bulldog (my baby) and people mistake him for a pit bull (though he’s VERY bulldog looking) or just plain think he’s mean because of his big head and macho appearance. If they only knew he’s a complete mama’s boy that sleeps under the covers with me and demands quality couch time every afternoon. It’s ridiculous to judge a dog simply by it’s breed. Golden retrievers are responsible for the most dog bites treated at ERs. I don’t see any uproar about banning GRs. Lets bad stupid dog owners, not the dogs.
I thought you might find this link interesting. I love them.
http://slog.thestranger.com/2008/03/gasp_its_a_propitbull_post#more
Sadly, I’ve actually heard a police officer say, “I don’t care what the owner says, any dog that bites a person’s a pitbull to me.” That kind of determined ignorance is completely detrimental to pitbull PR - and then of course it’s going to look like only pits bite, because you’re identifying every attacking dog as a pit regardless of its actual breed!
It’s gone so far here that I know plenty of renters who won’t rent to people with dogs considered “dangerous” - Rotties and pits among them, but sometimes even malamutes and huskies (??) - because homeowner’s insurance won’t always cover them. Which is a damn shame if you ask me, because those dogs are among the most intelligent and friendly that I’ve ever met - I’d take one of those breeds over a lab or a chihuahua any day.
Sigh. Of course it also doesn’t help that your point about the kind of people who ten to own pits is also mostly true in my experience. There are people living in the yard adjacent to mine who own two adorable pits who are unfortunately quite vicious critters because they’re outdoors all day with no company and no one to love them. If I thought they were any safer I’d be tempted to dig a hole under the fence so they could come visit me and my dog - but they snarl and snap anytime we come too close to the fence, so that’s no good. It breaks my heart to hear them out there day in and day out - their owners only communicate with them to yell at them to stop barking, it seems. Poor dogs :(
the not renting to folks with malamutes and huskies might be more because they can get destructive if left alone. dangerous? not so much.
Does anyone know where the new BSL laws are headed in Southern California. Have any of them passed into law? The San Diego area more specifically.
i’m glad to see some common sense published here. i was a meter reader for over 10 years in Charlotte, NC and pits were in my estimation no more aggressive than any other comparable breed. What disturbs me is that in reporting pit bull attacks, demographics are never mentioned. i know attacks can and do occur anywhere, but the fact is in poor neighborhoods pits are staked around crackhouses and other illegal institutions for fighting and to keep intruders away. Also, in these same areas, there are many children wandering the streets unwatched. Eventually the two meet. This is what is never told in the news. They obviously skew the reporting to support their own agendas.