Daily Archives: February 6, 2007

Feb 6

Goldilocks and The Thermostat

We’ve had two different air-temperature-changing units in this place since we’ve been here, so I don’t believe the fault lies with either of them, but with the thermostat.  Still, it makes me crazy.


If you imagine a line, not much thicker than this “l” right here at the 65 degree mark and another line, again, not much thicker than an “l”, but orange and moveable, with the goal being to make the orange line line up with the 65 degree line in a way that is both not too cold or not too hot.


If you get it just a smidge to the left of 65 degrees, the house hovers at around 60, with the heat not kicking on until it’s 59 in here.  BRRRR. 


If you get it too far to the right of that 65 degree line, the house hovers around 70 and the heat kicks back on every time it gets down to 65.  That’s a little warm for our tastes.


Right now, I think I have it precariously balanced right at the sweet spot, where it’s neither too warn nor too cold.


Still, I’d like to just be able to set the house to 65 and have it stay there.


Maybe such technology exists and is widely available to rich people, who, by definition, are more moral and deserving of good things than me.

Feb 6

Does Abstinence Only Education Work?

Today, there are reports that teen births are at record lows and so I must wonder, does abstinence only education work?  Is it responsible for the decline in teen births?

I have to say, even asking this question gives me great pause.

I think abstinence only education is immoral.  I’m not opposed to sex ed that stresses abstinence as a free and easy sure-fire way to prevent pregnancies and STDs, but I think, like all forms of birth control, there’s a predictable failure rate and not giving kids the information they need to keep themselves safe when such failures occur, when, with certain STDs, it can be a matter of life and death, is immoral and evil*.

But you know what I’ve come to realize?

South Park is right.  Most people are idiots.

Worse than that, they’re smug and self-righteous in their idiocy. 

So, you know, what the fuck do I know?  Maybe treating teenagers like they’re idiots who can’t make informed decisions and who, if they had real knowledge about how their bodies worked, would be out fucking it up more than they do now.

Just whoring around, ruining America.

Maybe there’s nothing wrong with the way we run around cluck cluck clucking like prudish Chicken Littles about how the sky is just crashing to earth over every little thing.  Even Keith Fucking Olbermann’s show tonight (with his little chick stand-in) had one story about girls in skimpy outfits doling out coffee in Seattle and how woo-woo naughty that was, and another story about how scandalous it was that Prince held his guitar in such a way that it suggested a penis.

You would think all the red-light, green-light we play about sex would give us whiplash, but I guess not.  Sex, sex, sex, but by god, don’t fuck.

Maybe it works.  What the fuck do I know?

Here’s what I learned as I was trying to figure out how you’d even begin to judge whether abstinence only education was responsible for declining birth rates.

In Mississippi, in 2004, twenty-nine percent of kids under 18 live in poverty, followed by Louisiana at 27%, New Mexico at 24%, Texas, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Alabama at 23%, Kentucky and Arizona at 22%, South Carolina and New York at 21%, and Oklahoma and Tennessee at 20%.

If you look at the percentage of the general population living in poverty, it’s 19% in Mississippi and Louisiana, 17% in New Mexico, 16% in Kentucky, West Virginia, Texas, Alabama, and Arkansas, with Tennessee, South Carolina, Arizona and New York coming in at 15%.

It’s useful to compare numbers.  In Mississippi, there are 549,224 people living in poverty; 212,865 of them are under the age of 18.  Here in Tennessee, there are 876,763 people living in poverty; 278,719 are children.

I mention this because when we look at the birth rates for teenage girls, you’ll see some familiar folks at the top of the list in 2000:

Nevada with 113 per 1,000, Arizona with 104; Mississippi and New Mexico with 103; Texas with 101; etc.

This is a blog, not a term paper, so you can look for yourself.  The point is that in places where there is a tremendous amount of poverty, we also find high rates of teens giving birth.  It takes no genius to see this as a self-perpetuating cycle.

Did I have a point?

Ah, yes, it was how I’d given up on you fuckers, left you to wallow in your own meanness, figuring, what the fuck?  You’ve got your ways I just don’t understand.

But you know, then my heart gets the best of me.  In Georgia, for instance, 1 out of the 386,095 kids out of the 1,006,329 people living in poverty is my nephew.  He’s ten.

If he starts having sex the same time his dad did, my brother could be a grandfather in four years**.

That’d be pretty dumbass, considering how hard his mom and dad’s lives have been.  But fourteen year old boys have a tendency to be pretty dumbass.  If they live through it and don’t end up in jail, it’s pretty funny later.

My point is that I’d like to leave y’all to rot in your own stupidity, but I’m stupid, too.  And so are the folks that I love.  And they, we, all of us, deserve compassion and understanding.

Which maybe doesn’t have anything to do with what’s responsible for lowering teen birth rates***, but it’s keeping me from driving out Highway 70, just punching random people.

 

 

*Is it just me or is that, perchance, the longest sentence I’ve ever written?

**Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.  If my oldest nephew takes after his mom’s side of the family, the recalcitrant brother could be a grandfather before I even have kids!

***Though I’m going to guess two factors: the widespread appearance of the home computer, so that kids whose families can afford them, can look up birth control information they’re not getting at school and the thoroughness with which our culture has been saturated by AIDS awareness.