So, if you’ve been flitting around the internet, you’ve certainly noticed that Campfield is still on his whole “Liberals love puppies more than they love babies” kick. And, unfortunately, he’s got folks riled up. Now, Mark Rose is all “Dogs receive more protection than unborn human beings.”
Really, at this point, this is bordering on ridiculous.
Stacey Campfield is a young, strong, spry man with a good job that allows him plenty of time to also be a state legislator. He lives in a beautiful part of the state with a vibrant culture (as explained by David Oatney right here). He’s got a mom he appears to love dearly (at least if we can take his blog as evidence) who has raised a child and gleaned wisdom from that. Campfield’s got a stable life, good education, good income, and a source of good advice.
He’s not married, but so what?
If “the children” are so important that we must curtail the rights of women in order to protect them, if they are in such dire straights that even a momentary focus away from their well-being onto the well-being of companion animals is a threat that must be mocked at every turn, then why isn’t Stacey Campfield doing more for Tennessee’s children?
There are about a hundred and seventy kids in Tennessee right now waiting to be adopted.
Why hasn’t Campfield adopted even one?