7 thoughts on “Shorter MediaLizzy

  1. WTF?

    I really couldn’t make myself read the whole thing, but my sense was that she was complaining that (1) Gloria Steinem is guilty of being jealous of beautiful women, (2) ugly feminists are guilty of trying to claim that history isn’t a romance novel, and (3) romance novelists who warp historical events into a novel with a different heroine and/or villain than she would have chosen are guilty of not catering to her exact fantasies. Oh, and despite the evidence of centuries of devotional literature and figurative art, everyone has always hated Mary Magdalene for being beautiful. And something about Perez Hilton. I repeat: WTF?

  2. Whew, I’m glad I wasn’t the only one that didn’t get any sense out of that post. I thought for a minute I had wet brain. I guess as a “vaguely masculine” woman I’m just so busy “killing the spirit of beautiful women” that I don’t have time to read incoherent posts.

  3. Thank goodness. I thought I’d had a stroke and lost all reading comprehension. Glad to know it really was just drivel with some polysyllabic words.

  4. Nothing really to add, except that this line cracked me up:

    A symmetric face, dewy skin, full lips, and a decent metabolism is not a choice.

    Having spent the better part of my life around dermatologists, I call bullshit. Maybe not for metabolism, but the rest you can absolutely change if you have the $$$.

    Beauty comes from the content of our character as well.

    But that’s beside the point, you vaguely masculine, ugly fat liberal bitch.

Comments are closed.