1. You gun nuts are missing the point in what Newscoma’s saying. So, let me give you the Reader’s Digest version. Politicians who supported the guns in bars legislation DID NOT consult with their constituents who are bar owners about this piece of legislation. So, many of them, regardless of their feelings about guns, were shocked and surprised to discover that it’s now legal to carry guns into bars, because they had no idea this was in the works. If you focus on the whole “but guns…” aspect of this, you are missing what Newscoma is trying to give the state a head’s up on. Politicians who passed this bill (who cares what the bill is), did not consult with their constituents most affected by the bill. These constituents have deep pockets. Even in a bad economy. And these constituents feel not just neglected by their local politicians, but, in this case, outright disregarded. She’s sending up a warning signal. If you guys choose to interpret it as being solely about guns, you will miss the warning.
2. Liz is back! Hurray!
3. Whenever I read something like this, I cannot help but wonder if Huddleston thinks all sexuality works like this. Is he saying that, if not for his strong personal will and the word of God, he’d be sticking his dick wherever he could? I mean, I thought the half-naked Red State Update guys on Huddleston’s blog were innocent and funny, but now I’m wondering.